Trust but verify: The case for astrophysical black holes
Scott A. Hughes
Abstract
This article is based on a pair of lectures given at the 2005 SLAC Summer Institute. Our goal is to motivate why most physicists and astrophysicists accept the hypothesis that the most massive, compact objects seen in many astrophysical systems are described by the black hole solutions of general relativity. We describe the nature of the most important black hole solutions, the Schwarzschild and the Kerr solutions. We discuss gravitational collapse and stability in order to motivate why such objects are the most likely outcome of realistic astrophysical collapse processes. Finally, we discuss some of the observations which -- so far at least -- are totally consistent with this viewpoint, and describe planned tests and observations which have the potential to falsify the black hole hypothesis, or sharpen still further the consistency of data with theory.
Create a lesson
Related papers
The Semileptonic B Frontier: LHC, B-factories, Lattice QCD & the Hunt for Precision
F. De Fazio, P. De Simone, M. Fedele et al.
Quantum-enhanced Search for Galactic Dark Photons Using Cat-State Cavities
Aoying Wang, Yanjie Zeng, Yanyan Cai et al.
Decoherence as a Detector-Resolution Flow
Yao Ji, Yuqi Wang
Radion/Dilaton portal freeze-in dark matter in extra-dimensional theories
Amrita Mukherjee, George Sanamyan, Dipan Sengupta
Superhorizon enhancement of the hydrodynamic GW tail in Standard Model embedded warm inflation
Simone Biondini, M. Laine
Thermal spectral functions of heavy and exotic Mesons from a hQCD at finite density
Zhou-Run Zhu, Zhanyuan Gao, Zhaohui Feng et al.