Reply to Comment on "Surprises in threshold antikaon-nucleon physics"
Jose A. Oller, Joaquim Prades, Michela Verbeni
Abstract
In their Comment, Borasoy et al. [arXiv:hep-ph/0512279], criticize our results [PRL 95 (2005) 172502] that accommodate both scattering data and the new accurate measurement by DEAR of the shift and width of kaonic hydrogen. In our calculations we have employed unitary chiral perturbation theory (UCHPT). We discuss why their arguments are irrelevant or do not hold.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Chiral soliton lattice in inhomogeneous magnetic fields
Tomas Brauner, Ramkumar Radhakrishnan
From the November Revolution toward the Millennium
Chris Quigg
An Axial UA(1)Lμ-Lτ: UV Completion and Experimental Searches
Rundong Fang, Jinhui Guo, Ming Li et al.
Hunting long-lived doubly charged scalars at the HL-LHC
Biplob Bhattacherjee, Rituparna Ghosh, Swagata Mukherjee et al.
Enigmatic properties of Ξ(1620) and Ξ(1690)
Taísa Veloso, K. P. Khemchandani, A. Martinez Torres et al.
Exploring Z/γ-mediated heavy FCNCs at the FCC-ee
Abhik Sarkar, Subhajit Kala, Amir Subba et al.