Measuring ΛMS at LEP
D. T. Barclay, C. J. Maxwell, M. T. Reader
Abstract
We show that standard next-to-leading order (NLO) perturbative QCD analyses used to extract αs from LEP data do not serve to disentangle the completely unknown renormalization scheme (RS) invariant next-NLO (NNLO) and higher-order uncalculated corrections from those dependent on the renormalization scale in a predictable manner. The resulting quoted values of αs(MZ) (ΛMS) with attendant scheme dependence uncertainties therefore reflect the ad hoc way in which they were extracted, rather than the actual values of these parameters. Choosing the scale so that the NLO coefficient vanishes (effective charge scheme) exposes the relative size of these unknown RS invariant higher order terms. They are seen to be sizeable for some of the LEP observables, indicating that they must be estimated if ΛMS is to be determined reliably. This can be accomplished either from NNLO calculations, at present only available for the hadronic width of the Z0 (RZ), or non-perturbatively by writing the RS-invariant uncertainty in Λ in terms of the running dR(Q)/d Q of the observable R(Q) with energy using an effective charge formalism. The NNLO calculations for RZ and LEP data supplemented by lower energy PETRA data lead to Λ(5)MS=287 100 MeV. We also
Create a lesson
Related papers
Chiral soliton lattice in inhomogeneous magnetic fields
Tomas Brauner, Ramkumar Radhakrishnan
From the November Revolution toward the Millennium
Chris Quigg
An Axial UA(1)Lμ-Lτ: UV Completion and Experimental Searches
Rundong Fang, Jinhui Guo, Ming Li et al.
Hunting long-lived doubly charged scalars at the HL-LHC
Biplob Bhattacherjee, Rituparna Ghosh, Swagata Mukherjee et al.
Enigmatic properties of Ξ(1620) and Ξ(1690)
Taísa Veloso, K. P. Khemchandani, A. Martinez Torres et al.
Exploring Z/γ-mediated heavy FCNCs at the FCC-ee
Abhik Sarkar, Subhajit Kala, Amir Subba et al.