Ambiguities in QED: Renormalons versus Triviality
D. Espriu, R. Tarrach
Abstract
We point out that, contrary to what is believed to hold for QCD, renormalons are genuine in QED; i.e. the ambiguities which come with them do not require cancellation by hypothetical non-perturbative contributions. They are just the ambiguities characteristic of any trivial ---and thus effective--- theory. If QED remained an isolated theory up to an energy close to its triviality scale, these ambiguities would surely hint at new physics. This not being so, the renormalon ambiguities in QED lead to no new physics, not even to non-perturbative contributions within QED itself.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Has Quarkyonic Matter Been Seen in Lattice Simulations?
Kohei Fujikura, Kenji Fukushima, Yoshimasa Hidaka et al.
Analytic parametrisations of the scale dependence of proton parton distributions
David F. Rentería-Estrada
DIS-secting the universe with high-energy neutrinos
Rhorry Gauld, Lorenzo Guerra, Ulrich Haisch et al.
Quantum Fourier integration of decay rates at next-to-leading order
David F. Rentería-Estrada
Light Primordial Black Holes from a First-Order Phase Transition near the End of Inflation: Baryogenesis and Gravitational Wave Signatures
Zihong Cheng, Fa Peng Huang
Investigating bottom quark effects in Higgs boson pair production
David Bürg, Gudrun Heinrich, Philipp Rendler