Computational Arithmetic Geometry I: Sentences Nearly in the Polynomial Hierarchy

Abstract

We consider the average-case complexity of some otherwise undecidable or open Diophantine problems. More precisely, consider the following: (I) Given a polynomial f in Z[v,x,y], decide the sentence ∃ v ∀ x ∃ y f(v,x,y)=0, with all three quantifiers ranging over N (or Z). (II) Given polynomials f1,...,fm in Z[x1,...,xn] with m>=n, decide if there is a rational solution to f1=...=fm=0. We show that, for almost all inputs, problem (I) can be done within coNP. The decidability of problem (I), over N and Z, was previously unknown. We also show that the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis (GRH) implies that, for almost all inputs, problem (II) can be done via within the complexity class PPNPNP, i.e., within the third level of the polynomial hierarchy. The decidability of problem (II), even in the case m=n=2, remains open in general. Along the way, we prove results relating polynomial system solving over C, Q, and Z/pZ. We also prove a result on Galois groups associated to sparse polynomial systems which may be of independent interest. A practical observation is that the aforementioned Diophantine problems should perhaps be avoided in the construction of crypto-systems.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…