Reflexive subgroups of the Baer-Specker group and Martin's axiom
Rüdiger Göbel, Saharon Shelah
Abstract
In two recent papers (math.LO/0003164 and math.LO/0003165) we answered a question raised in the book by Eklof and Mekler (p. 455, Problem 12) under the set theoretical hypothesis of diamondsuitaleph1 which holds in many models of set theory, respectively of the special continuum hypothesis (CH). The objects are reflexive modules over countable principal ideal domains R, which are not fields. Following H.Bass, an R-module G is reflexive if the evaluation map s:G ---> G** is an isomorphism. Here G*=Hom(G,R) denotes the dual module of G. We proved the existence of reflexive R-modules G of infinite rank with G not cong G+R, which provide (even essentially indecomposable) counter examples to the question mentioned above. Is CH a necessary condition to find `nasty' reflexive modules? In the last part of this paper we will show (assuming the existence of supercompact cardinals) that large reflexive modules always have large summands. So at least being essentially indecomposable needs an additional set theoretic assumption. However the assumption need not be CH as shown in the first part of this paper. We will use Martin's axiom to find reflexive modules with the above decomposition which are submodules of the Baer-Specker module Romega.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Logarithmic--exponential preparation in sharply o-minimal structures
Gal Binyamini, Oded Carmon, Dmitry Novikov
Stoic Logic and Natural Term Logic
Clarence Lewis Protin
From raw Solvability Complexity Index proofs to Weihrauch degrees
Christopher Sorg
Existence of bases implies the axiom of choice, a foundation-free proof
Gabriel Fernandes, Renan Maneli Mezabarba, Vinicius de Oliveira Rodrigues
Every countable meet-continuous lattice is Scott sober
Xiaoquan Xu, Wei Ji
A minimal type of Morley rank ω in a partial differential field
Piotr Kowalski