Kepler's Area Law in the Principia: Filling in some details in Newton's proof of Prop. 1
Michael Nauenberg
Abstract
During the past 25 years there has been a controversy regarding the adequacy of Newton's proof of Prop. 1 in Book 1 of the Principia. This proposition is of central importance because its proof of Kepler's area law allowed Newton to introduce a geometric measure for time to solve problems in orbital dynamics in the Principia. It is shown here that the critics of Prop. 1 have misunderstood Newton's fundamental limit argument by neglecting to consider the justification for this limit which he gave in Lemma 3. We clarify the proof of Prop. 1 by filling in some details left out by Newton which show that his proof of this proposition was adequate and well grounded.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Chebyshev and garment cutting. Debunking some myths
Victor Tapia
The suppression thesis in Riemann's Habilitationsvortrag
Victor Tapia
Remembering Solomon Marcus
Florin Nichita
The Erdős--Sós Theorem
David R. Wood
Math for AI safety: an invitation for mathematicians
Lionel Levine
Immensely Questionable Tests
Siyona Agarwal, Julian Bernhoft, Karam Gill et al.