Topological diagonalizations and Hausdorff dimension
Tomasz Weiss, Boaz Tsaban
Abstract
The Hausdorff dimension of a product XxY can be strictly greater than that of Y, even when the Hausdorff dimension of X is zero. But when X is countable, the Hausdorff dimensions of Y and XxY are the same. Diagonalizations of covers define a natural hierarchy of properties which are weaker than ``being countable'' and stronger than ``having Hausdorff dimension zero''. Fremlin asked whether it is enough for X to have the strongest property in this hierarchy (namely, being a gamma-set) in order to assure that the Hausdorff dimensions of Y and XxY are the same. We give a negative answer: Assuming CH, there exists a gamma-set of reals X and a set of reals Y with Hausdorff dimension zero, such that the Hausdorff dimension of X+Y (a Lipschitz image of XxY) is maximal, that is, 1. However, we show that for the notion of astrong gamma-set the answer is positive. Some related problems remain open.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Logarithmic--exponential preparation in sharply o-minimal structures
Gal Binyamini, Oded Carmon, Dmitry Novikov
Stoic Logic and Natural Term Logic
Clarence Lewis Protin
From raw Solvability Complexity Index proofs to Weihrauch degrees
Christopher Sorg
Existence of bases implies the axiom of choice, a foundation-free proof
Gabriel Fernandes, Renan Maneli Mezabarba, Vinicius de Oliveira Rodrigues
Every countable meet-continuous lattice is Scott sober
Xiaoquan Xu, Wei Ji
A minimal type of Morley rank ω in a partial differential field
Piotr Kowalski