Error-rate and decision-theoretic methods of multiple testing: Which genes have high objective probabilities of differential expression?
David R. Bickel
Abstract
Given a multiple testing situation, the null hypotheses that appear to have sufficiently low probabilities of truth may be rejected using a simple, nonparametric method of decision theory. This applies not only to posterior levels of belief, but also to conditional probabilities in the sense of relative frequencies, as seen from their equality to local false discovery rates (dFDRs). This approach neither requires the estimation of probability densities, nor of their ratios. Decision theory can inform the selection of false discovery rate weights. Decision theory is applied to gene expression microarrays with discussion of the applicability of the assumption of weak dependence.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Boolean Small-Ball Inequalities for Discrepancy Theory
Emrullah Akbas, Suvrit Sra
Markovian renormalisation for percolation in high-dimension: Semi-decidability of mean field behavior
Arthur Blanc-Renaudie
Point process convergence of large inradii of Poisson-Laguerre tessellations
Matthias Schulte, Martina Švarc Petráková
Interpolation of Gaussian Free Fields via Random Matrices
Gabriel Raposo
Almost-Uniform Bayesian Convergence to the Truth Is Not Characterized by Countable Additivity on Conditional Hitting Times
M. Ali Khan, Arthur Paul Pedersen, Maxwell B. Stinchcombe
The skeleton-blocks decomposition of Bienaymé trees, and applications to their local convergence
Marc Bernard, Robin Stephenson