Distances of Heegaard splittings
Aaron Abrams, Saul Schleimer
Abstract
J Hempel [Topology, 2001] showed that the set of distances of the Heegaard splittings (S,V, hn(V)) is unbounded, as long as the stable and unstable laminations of h avoid the closure of V in PML(S). Here h is a pseudo-Anosov homeomorphism of a surface S while V is the set of isotopy classes of simple closed curves in S bounding essential disks in a fixed handlebody. With the same hypothesis we show the distance of the splitting (S,V, hn(V)) grows linearly with n, answering a question of A Casson. In addition we prove the converse of Hempel's theorem. Our method is to study the action of h on the curve complex associated to S. We rely heavily on the result, due to H Masur and Y Minsky [Invent. Math. 1999], that the curve complex is Gromov hyperbolic.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Combinatorial Goussarov-Polyak-Viro Formulas for the Linking Number and Low Degree Coefficients of the Conway Polynomial
Nancy Scherich, Nathaniel Song
The flip symmetry on Khovanov-Rozansky homology
Hongjian Yang
Families of knots that cannot be made Legendrian parametrically
Javier Martínez-Aguinaga
Branched real projective structures on surfaces and geometrisation of representations
Gianluca Faraco, Nicholas Rungi
Generating the twist subgroup of the level 2 mapping class group of a non-orientable closed surface
Ryoma Kobayashi
H-cobordisms, infinite cyclic covers, and real Seiberg--Witten theory
Sungkyung Kang, JungHwan Park, Masaki Taniguchi