Distances of Heegaard splittings
Aaron Abrams, Saul Schleimer
Abstract
J Hempel [Topology, 2001] showed that the set of distances of the Heegaard splittings (S,V, hn(V)) is unbounded, as long as the stable and unstable laminations of h avoid the closure of V in PML(S). Here h is a pseudo-Anosov homeomorphism of a surface S while V is the set of isotopy classes of simple closed curves in S bounding essential disks in a fixed handlebody. With the same hypothesis we show the distance of the splitting (S,V, hn(V)) grows linearly with n, answering a question of A Casson. In addition we prove the converse of Hempel's theorem. Our method is to study the action of h on the curve complex associated to S. We rely heavily on the result, due to H Masur and Y Minsky [Invent. Math. 1999], that the curve complex is Gromov hyperbolic.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Smooth and Topological Nonorientable Four-Genera of Low-Crossing Knots
Seong-Jin Lee
Universal bounds for decompositions of PL manifolds
Rustam Sadykov
A surface-group action on real-hyperbolic space with no Cannon--Thurston map
Bruno Dular
Combination Theorems and the Farrell--Jones Conjecture for Graph Products of Pairs
I. Gkeneralis, S. Prassidis
Multivariable Alexander polynomials of twisted torus links via Dehn surgery
Birch Bryant
Quasimorphisms and bounded cohomology of transformation groups of nonorientable surfaces
Michael Brandenbursky