Why There Are No Gaps In The Support Of Non-Negative Integer-Valued Infinitely Divisible Laws?
S. Satheesh
Abstract
Remark.9 in Bose-Dasgupta-Rubin (2002) review states that when a non-negative integer-valued infinitely divisible law has an atom at unity then its support cannot have any gaps. Here one has two questions. (i) Why there are no gaps and (ii) Can there be gaps if the condition is not satisfied. Our investigation with these questions in mind centers on the implications of having and not having atoms at zero and unity. We give two examples/ constructions, which show that the remark needs modification and we modify it.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Boolean Small-Ball Inequalities for Discrepancy Theory
Emrullah Akbas, Suvrit Sra
Markovian renormalisation for percolation in high-dimension: Semi-decidability of mean field behavior
Arthur Blanc-Renaudie
Point process convergence of large inradii of Poisson-Laguerre tessellations
Matthias Schulte, Martina Švarc Petráková
Interpolation of Gaussian Free Fields via Random Matrices
Gabriel Raposo
Almost-Uniform Bayesian Convergence to the Truth Is Not Characterized by Countable Additivity on Conditional Hitting Times
M. Ali Khan, Arthur Paul Pedersen, Maxwell B. Stinchcombe
The skeleton-blocks decomposition of Bienaymé trees, and applications to their local convergence
Marc Bernard, Robin Stephenson