A Comparison of Information Concerning the Regression Parameter in The Accelerated Failure Time Model under Current Duration and Length Biased Sampling: Does it Pay to be Patient?
Bert van Es, Chris A. J. Klaassen, Philip J. Mokveld
Abstract
Longitudinal observations are sometimes costly or not available. Cross sectional sampling can be an alternative. Observations are drawn then at a specific point in time from a population of durations whose distributions satisfy a core model. Subsequently, one has a choice. One may process the data immediately, obtaining so called current duration data. Or one waits until the sampled durations are known completely obtaining the full durations via length biased sampling. We compare the Fisher information for the Euclidean parameter corresponding to an Accelerated Failure Time core model when the observations are obtained by either current duration or length biased sampling.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Conformal Prediction Through the Lens of Hypothesis Testing: Universality, Impossibility, and Optimality
Ryan J. Tibshirani, Rina Foygel Barber, Aaditya Ramdas
Connecting Riemannian Geometry and Statistical Inference for Correlation Matrices
Argyn Kuketayev
How far can symmetry help? Phase transitions and symmetry selection in sparse functional data analysis
Jocelyn Nembe
Posterior consistency for subdiffusion inverse problems
Haoyu Lu, Shaokang Zu, Junxiong Jia
Dimension comparison for Student's statistic under symmetric unimodality
Jacopo Lenzi
Statistical Properties of Nonparametric MLE under Laplace Noise
Yifei Xiong, Nianqiao Phyllis Ju, Vinayak Rao