The diagonal lemma as the formalized Grelling paradox
Gyorgy Sereny
Abstract
Since the diagonal lemma plays a key role in the proof of the main limitative theorems of logic, its proof could shed light on the very essence of these fundamental theorems. Yet the lemma is often characterized as one of those important logical results that lack an insightful explanatory proof. By making explicit that the well-known proof of the lemma is just a straightforward translation of the Grelling paradox into first-order arithmetic, the proof can be made completely transparent.
Create a lesson
Related papers
The universal measure of nonstochastic objects
Vladimir Vovk
Hyperarithmetic directions can all be exceptional for Marstrand's projection theorem
Noam Greenberg, Daniel Turetsky
Open Problems in Mathematical Logic
George Barmpalias, Su Gao, Jialiang He et al.
An easy proof that there may be no P-points
David Chodounský, Osvaldo Guzmán, Jonathan Verner
Comments on Choiceless Chain Conditions
Constance Bromham, Asaf Karagila
Localic Esakia Duality via Conic Frames
Nesta van der Schaaf