Representing Primes as x2 + 5y2: An Inductive Proof that Euler Missed
Ying Zhang
Abstract
We present an elementary inductive proof which Euler could have obtained, for the corresponding result as the title indicates, had he refined a bit his proof for Fermat's assertion on representing primes as two squares.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Value distribution of multiplicative functions along linear fractional sequences
Sun-Kai Leung
Delta theory of Anderson Modules II: Hodge-Pink structure
Sudip Pandit, Arnab Saha
Integers divisible by a shifted prime in a given interval
Rebecca Abi Abdallah, Valeriya Kovaleva, Jeremy Schlitt et al.
On Piatetski-Shapiro primes from almost primes
Yuhua Zhao, Jinjiang Li, Linji Long et al.
On Consecutive Non-primitive Elements over Finite Fields
Bidushi Sharma, Dhiren Kumar Basnet
Birch's theorem over function fields with quadratically many variables
Matthew Hase-Liu