On the (ab)use of statistics in the legal case against the nurse Lucia de B
Ronald Meester, Marieke Collins, Richard Gill, Michiel van Lambalgen
Abstract
We discuss the statistics involved in the legal case of the nurse Lucia de B. in The Netherlands, 2003-2004. Lucia de B. witnessed an unusually high number of incidents during her shifts, and the question arose as to whether this could be attributed to chance. We discuss and criticise the statistical analysis of Henk Elffers, a statistician who was asked by the prosecutor to write a statistical report on the issue. We discuss several other possibilities for statistical analysis. Our main point is that several statistical models exist, leading to very different predictions, or perhaps different answers to different questions. There is no such thing as a `best' statistical analysis.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Conformal Prediction Through the Lens of Hypothesis Testing: Universality, Impossibility, and Optimality
Ryan J. Tibshirani, Rina Foygel Barber, Aaditya Ramdas
Connecting Riemannian Geometry and Statistical Inference for Correlation Matrices
Argyn Kuketayev
How far can symmetry help? Phase transitions and symmetry selection in sparse functional data analysis
Jocelyn Nembe
Posterior consistency for subdiffusion inverse problems
Haoyu Lu, Shaokang Zu, Junxiong Jia
Dimension comparison for Student's statistic under symmetric unimodality
Jacopo Lenzi
Statistical Properties of Nonparametric MLE under Laplace Noise
Yifei Xiong, Nianqiao Phyllis Ju, Vinayak Rao