Universal graphs without large cliques
Peter Komjath, Saharon Shelah
Abstract
We give some existence/nonexistence statements on universal graphs, which under GCH give a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a universal graph of size lambda with no K(kappa), namely, if either kappa is finite or cf(kappa)>cf(lambda). (Here K(kappa) denotes the complete graph on kappa vertices.) The special case when lambda< kappa= lambda was first proved by F. Galvin. Next, we investigate the question that if there is no universal K(kappa)-free graph of size lambda then how many of these graphs embed all the other. It was known, that if lambda< lambda= lambda (e.g., if lambda is regular and the GCH holds below lambda), and kappa = omega, then this number is lambda+. We show that this holds for every kappa <= lambda of countable cofinality. On the other hand, even for kappa = omega1, and any regular lambda >= omega1 it is consistent that the GCH holds below lambda, 2lambda is as large as we wish, and the above number is either lambda+ or 2lambda, so both extremes can actually occur.
Create a lesson
Related papers
The universal measure of nonstochastic objects
Vladimir Vovk
Hyperarithmetic directions can all be exceptional for Marstrand's projection theorem
Noam Greenberg, Daniel Turetsky
Open Problems in Mathematical Logic
George Barmpalias, Su Gao, Jialiang He et al.
An easy proof that there may be no P-points
David Chodounský, Osvaldo Guzmán, Jonathan Verner
Comments on Choiceless Chain Conditions
Constance Bromham, Asaf Karagila
Localic Esakia Duality via Conic Frames
Nesta van der Schaaf