On the number of non-isomorphic subgraphs
Saharon Shelah, Lajos Soukup
Abstract
Let K be the family of graphs on omega1 without cliques or independent subsets of size omega1 . We prove that: 1) it is consistent with CH that every G in K has 2omega1 many pairwise non-isomorphic subgraphs, 2) the following proposition holds in L: (*) there is a G in K such that for each partition (A,B) of omega1 either G cong G[A] or G cong G[B], 3) the failure of (*) is consistent with ZFC.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Logarithmic--exponential preparation in sharply o-minimal structures
Gal Binyamini, Oded Carmon, Dmitry Novikov
Stoic Logic and Natural Term Logic
Clarence Lewis Protin
From raw Solvability Complexity Index proofs to Weihrauch degrees
Christopher Sorg
Existence of bases implies the axiom of choice, a foundation-free proof
Gabriel Fernandes, Renan Maneli Mezabarba, Vinicius de Oliveira Rodrigues
Every countable meet-continuous lattice is Scott sober
Xiaoquan Xu, Wei Ji
A minimal type of Morley rank ω in a partial differential field
Piotr Kowalski