Was Sierpinski right? IV
Abstract
We prove for any mu = mu< mu< theta < lambda, lambda large enough (just strongly inaccessible Mahlo) the consistency of 2mu = lambda-> [theta]23 and even 2mu = lambda-> [theta]2sigma,2 for sigma < mu . The new point is that possibly theta > mu+ .
0
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.