Biases in the Shanks-Renyi Prime Number Race
Abstract
Rubinstein and Sarnak investigated systems of inequalities of the form pi(x;q,a1) > ... > pi(x;q,ar), where pi(x;q,a) denotes the number of primes up to x that are congruent to a mod q. They showed, under standard hypotheses on the zeros of Dirichlet L-functions mod q, that the set of positive real numbers x for which these inequalities hold has positive (logarithmic) density deltaq;a1,dots,ar > 0. They also discovered the surprising fact that a certain distribution associated with these densities is not symmetric under permutations of the residue classes aj in general, even if the aj are all squares or all nonsquares mod q (a condition necessary to avoid obvious biases of the type first observed by Chebyshev). This asymmetry suggests, contrary to prior expectations, that the densities deltaq;a1,dots,ar themselves vary under permutations of the aj. In this paper, we derive (under the hypotheses used by Rubinstein and Sarnak) a general formula for the densities deltaq;a1,dots,ar, and we use this formula to calculate many of these densities when q <= 12 and r <= 4. For the special moduli q = 8 and q = 12, and for a1,a2,a3 a permutation of the nonsquares 3,5,7 mod 8 and 5,7,11 mod 12, respectively, we rigorously bound the error in our calculations, thus verifying that these densities are indeed asymmetric under permutation of the aj. We also determine several situations in which the densities deltaq;a1,dots,ar remain unchanged under certain permutations of the aj, and some situations in which they are provably different.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.