When Can we Call a System Self-organizing?
Carlos Gershenson, Francis Heylighen
Abstract
We do not attempt to provide yet another definition of selforganization, but explore the conditions under which we can model a system as self-organizing. These involve the dynamics of entropy, and the purpose, aspects, and description level chosen by an observer. We show how, changing the level or "graining" of description, the same system can appear selforganizing or self-disorganizing. We discuss ontological issues we face when studying self-organizing systems, and analyse when designing and controlling artificial self-organizing systems is useful. We conclude that self-organization is a way of observing systems, not an absolute class of systems.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Trail systems self-organize through individual route optimization
Brendan Wallace, Andrew Berdahl
Optimal design of higher-order interactions for mutual synchronization among three collectively oscillating networks
Sotaro Kuroiwa, Yuzuru Kato
Optic flow in the visual system determines interaction force and collective motion
Susumu Ito, Nariya Uchida
The limits of higher-order interactions in shaping chimera states
Ediline L. F. Nguessap, Thierry Njougouo, Fernando Fagundes Ferreira
Digital Twins of Networked Dynamical Systems: Machine Learning Prediction of Synchronization Transitions in Coupled Chaotic Oscillators
Huawei Fan, Yao Du, Meng-Xia Bi et al.
Noise-driven loss of chimera states and bifurcations in a nonlocal oscillator ring
Lintao Liu, Nariya Uchida