Classical, semiclassical, and quantum investigations of the 4-sphere scattering system
J. Main, E. Atilgan, H. S. Taylor, G. Wunner
Abstract
A genuinely three-dimensional system, viz. the hyperbolic 4-sphere scattering system, is investigated with classical, semiclassical, and quantum mechanical methods at various center-to-center separations of the spheres. The efficiency and scaling properties of the computations are discussed by comparisons to the two-dimensional 3-disk system. While in systems with few degrees of freedom modern quantum calculations are, in general, numerically more efficient than semiclassical methods, this situation can be reversed with increasing dimension of the problem. For the 4-sphere system with large separations between the spheres, we demonstrate the superiority of semiclassical versus quantum calculations, i.e., semiclassical resonances can easily be obtained even in energy regions which are unattainable with the currently available quantum techniques. The 4-sphere system with touching spheres is a challenging problem for both quantum and semiclassical techniques. Here, semiclassical resonances are obtained via harmonic inversion of a cross-correlated periodic orbit signal.
Create a lesson
Related papers
A comparison of three models of a whirling string as it becomes chaotic
Nicholas B. Tufillaro
Modal interactions in strongly nonlinear coupled oscillators with closely spaced modes and nonclassical damping distribution
C. A. Hubay, T. Kalmar-Nagy, L. Bergman et al.
Nonintegrability theorem on perturbed integrable Hamiltonian dynamical systems with two independent resonances
Nikos Zafeiriadis, Efthymia Meletlidou, Christos Efthymiopoulos et al.
PRISM: Unifying multiphysics optothermal transport and identifiability-guided inference for nanoscale thermal metrology
Yicong Qiu, Ziyang Zhong, Ziyan Qian et al.
Ultraslow diffusion emerging from local symmetry breaking in quenched disorder
Jin Liu, Rainer Klages, Huihai Wang et al.
A model for the dimension of the inertial manifold of the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation
Melisa Y. Vinograd, Patricio Clark di Leoni