Comment on "Electromagnetic dissociation of 8B and the astrophysical S-factor for 7Be(p,gamma)8B"
K. A. Snover, A. R. Junghans, E. C. Mohrmann
Abstract
Recently, Davids and Typel recommended a "low" value of S17(0) based on fits to published direct and Coulomb dissociation data, in which they excluded the precise result of Junghans et al. We show that their statistical analysis is incorrect, due to a substantial underestimate of the experimental uncertainties, and leads to conclusions that are not supported by a proper analysis.
Create a lesson
Related papers
New Neutron Polarizabilities from Deuterium Compton Scattering at HIγS
D. Godagama, M. W. Ahmed, B. Crowe et al.
Search for the 229Pa Parity Doublet via Internal-Conversion Spectroscopy at FRIB
Silviu-Marian Udrescu, Aiden Boyer, Lan Cheng et al.
Cumulative protons and pions at the intermediate energies in the FRAGM experiment
M. A. Martemianov, B. M. Abramov, S. A. Bulychjov et al.
Precise and accurate nuclear electric quadrupole moment of 223Ra from molecular spectroscopy
C. M. Fajardo-Zambrano, M. Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis, L. Lalanne et al.
Differential measurement of global polarization of Λ, Ξ, and Ω hyperons in Au+Au collisions at sNN=7.7--27~GeV from the RHIC Beam Energy Scan-II
The STAR Collaboration
Regularity of core coupled high-spin structure in neutron-rich 196-202Au isotopes approaching N =126
Y. Cho, Y. H. Kim, A. Navin et al.