Comment on ``Phase Coexistence in Multifragmentation''
D. H. E. Gross, A. S. Botvina
Abstract
This comment on Moretto et al.PRL 76:372,1996 argues that the IMF-charge distribution may not be useful as signal for phase-transitions in nuclear multifragmentation. Fluctuations of different origin may corrupt this signal. Energy conservation is as important as charge conservation. The caloric equation of state is more safe.
Create a lesson
Related papers
New Neutron Polarizabilities from Deuterium Compton Scattering at HIγS
D. Godagama, M. W. Ahmed, B. Crowe et al.
Search for the 229Pa Parity Doublet via Internal-Conversion Spectroscopy at FRIB
Silviu-Marian Udrescu, Aiden Boyer, Lan Cheng et al.
Cumulative protons and pions at the intermediate energies in the FRAGM experiment
M. A. Martemianov, B. M. Abramov, S. A. Bulychjov et al.
Precise and accurate nuclear electric quadrupole moment of 223Ra from molecular spectroscopy
C. M. Fajardo-Zambrano, M. Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis, L. Lalanne et al.
Differential measurement of global polarization of Λ, Ξ, and Ω hyperons in Au+Au collisions at sNN=7.7--27~GeV from the RHIC Beam Energy Scan-II
The STAR Collaboration
Regularity of core coupled high-spin structure in neutron-rich 196-202Au isotopes approaching N =126
Y. Cho, Y. H. Kim, A. Navin et al.