Three-Body Scattering at Intermediate Energies
H. Liu, Ch. Elster, W. Gloeckle
Abstract
The Faddeev equation for three-body scattering at arbitrary energies is formulated in momentum space and directly solved in terms of momentum vectors without employing a partial wave decomposition. In its simplest form the Faddeev equation for identical bosons, which we are using, is a three-dimensional integral equation in five variables, magnitudes of relative momenta and angles. This equation is solved through Pade summation. Based on a Malfliet-Tjon-type potential, the numerical feasibility and stability of the algorithm for solving the Faddeev equation is demonstrated. Special attention is given to the selection of independent variables and the treatment of three-body break-up singularities with a spline based method. The elastic differential cross section, semi-exclusive d(N,N') cross sections and total cross sections of both elastic and breakup processes in the intermediate energy range up to about 1 GeV are calculated and the convergence of the multiple scattering series is investigated in every case. In general a truncation in the first or second order in the two-body t-matrix is quite insufficient.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Parametrization of unitary matrices, parametrizing the symmetric S matrix and the NN S matrix above the inelastic threshold
N. A. Khokhlov
Thermofractal Dynamics in the Multisource Thermal Model: A Unified Approach to Multiparticle Production
Airton Deppman, Trambak Bhattacharyya, Maciej Rybczyński et al.
Electroweak Constraints on Nuclear Neutron Distributions and the Low-Energy Weak Mixing Angle
Xu-Run Huang, Tong-Gang Yue, Zhen Zhang et al.
Active-subspace learning reveals dominant parameter directions in nuclear observables
Tom Plies, Margarida Companys Franzke, Achim Schwenk
Shape coexisting intruder states in even Sn isotopes and their influence on the B4/2<1 anomaly
P. Buganu, R. Benjedi, R. Budaca
Light nucleus and hypernucleus production at RHIC and LHC energies: a comparative study of phenomenological models
J. Aichelin, A. Andronic, F. Bellini et al.