Nuclear statistics, microcanonical or canonical? The physicists vs. the chemists approach
D. H. E. Gross
Abstract
Nuclei are small and inhomogeneous. Multi-fragmented nuclei are even more inhomogeneous and the fragments even smaller. System studied in chemical thermodynamics (CTh) consist of several homogeneous macroscopic phases. Evidently, macroscopic statistics as in Chemistry cannot and should not be applied. Taking this serious, fascinating perspectives open for statistical nuclear fragmentation.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Constraining three-nucleon forces in nuclear lattice effective field theory
Serdar Elhatisari, Ulf-G. Meißner, Zhengxue Ren et al.
Collective-flow signatures of bubble nuclei in intermediate-energy projectile fragmentation reactions
Ge Ren, Chun-Wang Ma, Xi-Guang Cao et al.
R-process nuclei in the rare-earth region above N=126 in Relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov theory: A preponderance of shape-coexistence in nuclei
M. M. Sharma
Binding energies in the 0-+ and 1-- fermion--antifermion channels from the ladder Bethe-Salpeter and Schrödinger equations
Wei He, Hai-Qing Zhou
Strange-quark-number-dependent response to partonic dynamics in baryon-rich Au+Au collisions
Di Zhao, Xun Zhu, Gao-Chan Yong
A 4D T-expanded lattice QCD equation of state with a multi-dimensional 3D-Ising-type critical contribution
Francesco Di Clemente, Prachi Garella, Johannes Jahan et al.