The classification of diagrams in perturbation theory
D. R. Phillips, I. R. Afnan
Abstract
The derivation of scattering equations connecting the amplitudes obtained from diagrammatic expansions is of interest in many branches of physics. One method for deriving such equations is the classification-of-diagrams technique of Taylor. However, as we shall explain in this paper, there are certain points of Taylor's method which require clarification. Firstly, it is not clear whether Taylor's original method is equivalent to the simpler classification-of-diagrams scheme used by Thomas, Rinat, Afnan and Blankleider (TRAB). Secondly, when the Taylor method is applied to certain problems in a time-dependent perturbation theory it leads to the over-counting of some diagrams. This paper first restates Taylor's method, in the process uncovering reasons why certain diagrams might be double-counted in the Taylor method. It then explores how far Taylor's method is equivalent to the simpler TRAB method. Finally, it examines precisely why the double-counting occurs in Taylor's method, and derives corrections which compensate for this double-counting.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Density-driven α-particle clustering in neutron-rich oxygen isotopes
M. Davies, E. Yüksel, J. -P. Ebran et al.
Multi-phonon wobbling excitations as a probe for dynamical quasiparticle alignment
R. Budaca, A. I. Budaca
Interacting Boson System at Finite Temperatures: The treatment of the lattice QCD results
D. Anchishkin, V. Gnatovskyy, D. Zhuravel et al.
Spurious center-of-mass mode as an S-matrix pole within the Jost-random-phase approximation
Kazuhito Mizuyama
Quantum computing for high energy nuclear physics
João Barata
Elliptic and triangular flow responses in O+O and Ne+Ne collisions from hydrodynamics and kinetic theory
Victor E. Ambrus, Giuliano Giacalone, Clemens Werthmann et al.