On the computational capabilities of physical systems part I: the impossibility of infallible computation
David H. Wolpert
Abstract
In this first of two papers, strong limits on the accuracy of physical computation are established. First it is proven that there cannot be a physical computer C to which one can pose any and all computational tasks concerning the physical universe. Next it is proven that no physical computer C can correctly carry out any computational task in the subset of such tasks that can be posed to C. As a particular example, this means that there cannot be a physical computer that can, for any physical system external to that computer, take the specification of that external system's state as input and then correctly predict its future state before that future state actually occurs. The results also mean that there cannot exist an infallible, general-purpose observation apparatus, and that there cannot be an infallible, general-purpose control apparatus. These results do not rely on systems that are infinite, and/or non-classical, and/or obey chaotic dynamics. They also hold even if one uses an infinitely fast, infinitely dense computer, with computational powers greater than that of a Turing Machine.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Discovering like a scientist: Literature-informed dimensionless learning for physical closure of data-driven equations
Hao Xu, Tianhao Wu, Dongxiao Zhang
Identifying the Shear Piezoelectric Coefficient using Physics-Informed Neural Networks under Exact Boundary and Initial Constraints
Suhas Suresh Bharadwaj
Fracture-Bench: A Controlled Benchmark Suite for Machine Learning Surrogates in Phase-Field Fracture Mechanics
Meenu Krishnan U., Maryam Hakimzadeh, Indrashish Saha et al.
Noise-resilient collective order through temporal memory in self-propelled particles
Mihir Durve, Sauro Succi, Antonio Celani
Site-orbit masked twin-branch Transformer for symmetry-constrained crystal generation
Junchi Liu, Haoran Si, Luo Yan et al.
Maximal correlation and optimal transformations of probability distributions in tensor-train format: a variational algorithm
Kayo Kinjo, Jun Ohkubo