Nonholonomic Constraints and Voronec's Equations
Nivaldo A. Lemos
Abstract
Is it allowed, in the context of the Lagrange multiplier formalism, to assume that nonholonomic constraints are already in effect while setting up Lagrange's function? This procedure is successfully applied in a recent book [L. N. Hand and J. D Finch, Analytical Mechanics] to the problem of the rolling penny, but it does not work in general, as we show by means of a counterexample. It turns out that in many cases the use of nonholonomic constraints in the process of construction of the Lagrangian is allowed, but the correct equations of motion are the little known Voronec's equations.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Active Learning with Generative AI in Introductory Physics: A Multi-Institutional Study of the P-A.I.R. Framework
Bilas Paul, Shantanu Chakraborty, Shruti Shrestha et al.
"Existential dread": Student and faculty views on the impact of changes in federal science funding to physics research
Meagan Sundstrom, Ian Olivant, Eric Brewe
Combining heavy-tailed keystroke dynamics with eye tracking reveals temporal flexibility in human problem solving
Yavuz Dinc, Fabian Kieser, Peter Wulff et al.
From Venus to the Parking Lot: A Flexible Stellar Interferometry Experiment
Eric J. Friedman, Michelle Goman
Teaching quantum mechanics in secondary schools: A qubit-first learning path to Bell's inequalities
Alberto Carlini, Andrea Lanza, Dalida Monti et al.
Connectivism as an Innovative Didactic Experience in Preservice Physics Teacher Education
Daniel Alejandro Valderrama, Karen Alexandra Gutiérrez Amaya