The New Paradigm for Gamma Ray Bursts: a Case of Unethical Behaviour?
A. De Rujula
Abstract
One might have hoped that the immediacy and completeness of scientific information provided through the internet would have made the wrongful appropriation of someone else's ideas --now so easy to detect and document-- a sin of the past. Not so. Here I present evidence, which the reader should judge, of such an apparent misconduct by Sir Martin Rees, the British Astronomer Royal, and others. Unethical behaviour is not unknown in science. My sole intention is to call attention to the problem by way of example, in an attempt to contribute to a more ethical atmosphere, which would in my opinion be beneficial to the field.
Create a lesson
Related papers
How Rich is the Rich-Club? Super Rich-Club Organization in Complex Networks
Lucía S. Ramirez, Laia Barjuan, M. Ángeles Serrano
Limited knowledge exchange across biological subfields in agent-based modelling: an LLM-assisted bibliometric analysis
Kira Pugh, Rebecca M Crossley, Sara Hamis
Informing research priorities for distributed acoustic sensing: insights from a citizens' panel
Hannah Dalgleish, Rafael Mestre, Heidi Wheatley et al.
Emergent regularity of walking patterns: evidence from Swiss cities
Guo-Shiuan Lin, Martin Hendrick, Maider Llaguno-Munitxa et al.
A Cracked Mirror: How People Perceive Gender Performance by Large Language Models
Faezeh Fadaei, Jenny Carla Moran, Taha Yasseri
Stochastic dose fluctuations in boron neutron capture therapy with heterogeneous boron distributions
Ramacos Fardela, Roni Muslim, Tista Artu Indra Kusuma