A note on Delta ln L = -1/2 Errors
Roger Barlow
Abstract
The points at which the log likelihood falls by 1/2 from its maximum value are often used to give the `errors' on a result, i.e. the 68% central confidence interval. The validity of this is examined for two simple cases: a lifetime measurement and a Poisson measurement. Results are compared with the exact Neyman construction and with the simple Bartlett approximation. It is shown that the accuracy of the log likelihood method is poor, and the Bartlett construction explains why it is flawed.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Reduced latent leakage does not reliably predict lower likelihood bias in collider inference
Tong Pan
The Greedy Bump Bias: Local Profiling Geometry and the Look-Elsewhere Effect
Tommaso Dorigo
Multi-fidelity Monte Carlo estimation of floor response spectra under combined seismic and structural parameter uncertainties
Nils Baillie, Baptiste Kerleguer, Cyril Feau et al.
Parameter inference from a non-stationary unknown process using statistical feature-based slow feature analysis
Kieran S. Owens, Masako Tamaki, Ben D. Fulcher
A Probability Model for Pentagonal Prism Dice Rolls
Paul R. Hurst, J. Naleo Hyde
Geometry-native machine learning reconstruction of DSMC moment fields with support monitoring
Ehsan Roohi