Comment on ``Torque or no torque? Simple charged particle motion observed in different inertial frames,'' by J. D. Jackson [Am. J. Phys. 72 (12), 1484-1487 (2004)]
Tomislav Ivezic
Abstract
In this paper it is shown that the real cause of the apparent electrodynamic paradox discussed by Jackson [J. D. Jackson, Am. J. Phys. 72, 1484 (2004)] is the use of three-dimensional (3D) quantities E, B, F, L, N, .. . When 4D geometric quantities are used then there is no paradox and the principle of relativity is naturally satisfied.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Finite-amplitude establishment beyond local invasion in cooperative chemical networks
Ferran Martínez-Reyes, Slava G. Turyshev
A Unified Perspective on Poincaré and Galilei Relativity: II. General Relativity: A. Kinematics
Christian Y. Cardall
Fine structure of fermion mixing and quark-mass hierarchies
Jacek Ciborowski
Constructions of Variable Modified Chaplygin-Jacobi and Chaplygin-Abel Gases from Geometrothermodynamics
Anamika Kotal, Ujjal Debnath
The Umami Chaplygin Gas as a Unified Dark Fluid: Observational Constraints, Perturbative and Thermodynamic Stability Analysis
Trishit Banerjee, Atreyee Biswas
Holographic dark energy through Kruglov entropy
Umesh Kumar Sharma, P. Suresh Kumar