Reply to Comment on Symbolic Calculation of Two-Center Overlap Integrals Over Slater-Type Orbitals
Sedat Gumus, Telhat Ozdogan
Abstract
The comments of Guseinov are critically analyzed. Contrary to his comments, it is pointed out that our formula for two-center overlap integrals over Slater type orbitals have been derived independently, not derived from the earlier works of Guseinov by changing the summation indices. Therefore, our algorithm is original, is not affected from possible instability problems and can be used in large scale calculations without loss of significant figures. Meanwhile, it should be stressed that his comment on the transformation of our formula into his formula proves the correctness of our algorithm and therefore can be regarded as a nice sound of science.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Real-Time Emergence of Charge-Transfer-to-Solvent States from Core Excitation
Jiří Suchan, B. Scott Fales, Benjamin G. Levine et al.
ElemCo.jl: A Julia package for electron-correlation methods
Daniel Kats, Charlotte Rickert, Thomas Schraivogel et al.
Franson-Interferometric Bounds on Entangled Two-Photon Absorption
Albin Hedse, Sankaran Ramesh, Luis Matheis et al.
The off-diagonal low rank property: new opportunities for low-scaling computational chemistry methods
Zikuan Wang
Core-valence double ionization of SF6 involving S2p, F1s and S1s inner shells
Veronica Daver Ideböhn, Daniel M. Pereira, Lucas M. Cornetta et al.
Benchmark of Multi-Channel Dyson Equation and Algebraic Diagrammatic Construction Methods for molecules
Mike Keizer, Stefano Paggi, J. Arjan Berger et al.