An effective method for polarising antiprotons
Th. Walcher, H. Arenhövel, K. Aulenbacher, R. Barday, A. Jankowiak
Abstract
There exists an inconsistency in the value of the kinetic energies of the antiproton in the electron laboratory reference frame and of the electron in the antiproton laboratory reference frame taken wrongly both as 0.65 keV (see figure 1 and table 2) of the paper. The consequence of this mistake is that the relative velocity of the electron is not -0.0504 (see table 2) but -0.00118, i.e. a factor of melectron/mproton = 1/43 smaller. The consequence of this factor is that the relative velocity βrelative in eq. (27) and κare smaller by this factor. This means that the time for polarisation build-up is longer by a factor 43. Though the principle idea is not put into question, the method is not effective "with todays technology" and we have to withdraw the paper and the proposal.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Large Magnet Structures for Fusion Technology: Lessons from ITER
Neil Mitchell
Muon acceleration at J-PARC
Shusei Kamioka, Masato Kimura, Yuga Nakazawa
Machine Learning Based ROI Segmentation for Beam Imaging Diagnostics at Accelerators
Prachiti Sujit Chandratreya, Frank Mayet, Sergey Tomin et al.
Digital Signal Processing for Beam Instrumentation
Andrea Boccardi
A European high-energy heavy-ion facility for electronics irradiation based at CERN: Concept Design Report
Edgar Cristopher Cortés García, Ruben García Alia, Matthew Alexander Fraser et al.
Feasibility demonstration of a high-momentum, high-purity muon beamline at the J-PARC Hadron Experimental Facility
Kotaro Shirotori, Takaya Akaishi, Kazuya Aoki et al.