About the proof of the so called exact classical confidence intervals. Where is the trick?
G. D'Agostini
Abstract
In this note I go through the `proof' of frequentistic confidence intervals and show what it logically implies concerning the value of a physical quantity given an experimental observation (nothing).
Create a lesson
Related papers
Multivariate amplitude analysis of the cascade particle decays based on the Nearest Neighbors fitting
I. V. Yeletskikh, A. O. Vasyukov
The geometry of uncertainty decomposition in profile-likelihood fits
Rafael Coelho Lopes de Sá
Statistical validation of calorimeter inpainting with generative diffusion priors
Himanshu Raj, Roli Esha
Unknown Unknowns: Model Misspecification in Machine Learning for Physics
Juan Cruz-Martinez, Carolina Cuesta-Lazaro, Alexander Held et al.
Exploring new directions in enhancing the ACTS parameter optimization suite
Chance LaVoie, Qi Bin Lei, Rocky Bala Garg et al.
Analytically Consistent Reconstruction of Finite Data Using Padé Sequences
Emerson Díaz, Balma Duch, Pere Masjuan