Climate simulations for 1880-2003 with GISS modelE
J. Hansen, M. Sato, R. Ruedy, P. Kharecha, A. Lacis, R. Miller, L. Nazarenko, K. Lo, G. A. Schmidt, G. Russell, I. Aleinov, S. Bauer, E. Baum, B. Cairns, V. Canuto, M. Chandler, Y. Cheng, A. Cohen, A. Del Genio, G. Faluvegi, E. Fleming, A. Friend, T. Hall, C. Jackman, J. Jonas, M. Kelley, N. Y. Kiang, D. Koch, G. Labow, J. Lerner, S. Menon, T. Novakov, V. Oinas, Ja. Perlwitz, Ju. Perlwitz, D. Rind, A. Romanou, R. Schmunk, D. Shindell, P. Stone, S. Sun, D. Streets, N. Tausnev, D. Thresher, N. Unger, M. Yao, S. Zhang
Abstract
We carry out climate simulations for 1880-2003 with GISS modelE driven by ten measured or estimated climate forcings. An ensemble of climate model runs is carried out for each forcing acting individually and for all forcing mechanisms acting together. We compare side-by-side simulated climate change for each forcing, all forcings, observations, unforced variability among model ensemble members, and, if available, observed variability. Discrepancies between observations and simulations with all forcings are due to model deficiencies, inaccurate or incomplete forcings, and imperfect observations. Although there are notable discrepancies between model and observations, the fidelity is sufficient to encourage use of the model for simulations of future climate change. By using a fixed well-documented model and accurately defining the 1880-2003 forcings, we aim to provide a benchmark against which the effect of improvements in the model, climate forcings, and observations can be tested. Principal model deficiencies include unrealistically weak tropical El Nino-like variability and a poor distribution of sea ice, with too much sea ice in the Northern Hemisphere and too little in the Southern Hemisphere. The greatest uncertainties in the forcings are the temporal and spatial variations of anthropogenic aerosols and their indirect effects on clouds.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Bridging short- and medium-range weather forecasting with machine learning
Timothy A. Smith, Mariah Pope, Sergey Frolov et al.
Detectability of Forced ENSO Changes under Global Warming: Insights from the Recharge Oscillator
Sooman Han, Jérôme Vialard, Alexey V. Fedorov et al.
When Does Forecast-Error Energy Grow Logistically in Geophysical Turbulence?
Malaquias Peña
A place for stabilization alongside tipping cascades: the AMOC-cryosphere system
Sacha Sinet
Missing the Butterfly and Predicting the Past: Features or Bugs of Accurate AI Weather Models?
Pedram Hassanzadeh, Weidong Li, Y. Qiang Sun et al.
AICON: An operational global machine learning weather forecasting model
Tobias Goecke, Marek Jacob, Florian Prill et al.