Growth Models And The Question Of Universality Classes
W. E. Hagston, H. Ketterl
Abstract
In the past many papers have appeared which simulated surface growth with different growth models. The results showed that, if models differed only slightly in their `growth' rules, the resulting surfaces may belong to different universality classes, i.e. they are described by different differential equations. In the present paper we describe a mapping of ``growth rules'' to differential operators and give plausibility arguments for this mapping. We illustrate the validity of our theory by applying it to published results.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Discovering like a scientist: Literature-informed dimensionless learning for physical closure of data-driven equations
Hao Xu, Tianhao Wu, Dongxiao Zhang
Identifying the Shear Piezoelectric Coefficient using Physics-Informed Neural Networks under Exact Boundary and Initial Constraints
Suhas Suresh Bharadwaj
Fracture-Bench: A Controlled Benchmark Suite for Machine Learning Surrogates in Phase-Field Fracture Mechanics
Meenu Krishnan U., Maryam Hakimzadeh, Indrashish Saha et al.
Noise-resilient collective order through temporal memory in self-propelled particles
Mihir Durve, Sauro Succi, Antonio Celani
Site-orbit masked twin-branch Transformer for symmetry-constrained crystal generation
Junchi Liu, Haoran Si, Luo Yan et al.
Maximal correlation and optimal transformations of probability distributions in tensor-train format: a variational algorithm
Kayo Kinjo, Jun Ohkubo