Growth Models And The Question Of Universality Classes
W. E. Hagston, H. Ketterl
Abstract
In the past many papers have appeared which simulated surface growth with different growth models. The results showed that, if models differed only slightly in their `growth' rules, the resulting surfaces may belong to different universality classes, i.e. they are described by different differential equations. In the present paper we describe a mapping of ``growth rules'' to differential operators and give plausibility arguments for this mapping. We illustrate the validity of our theory by applying it to published results.
Create a lesson
Related papers
How durable are high-performance racing shoes?
Jeremy A. McCulloch, Ellen Kuhl
Correlation-Free Transition Path Sampling through Shooting Point Generation Guided by Committor Learning
Maximilian Negedly, Sebastian Falkner, Alessandro Coretti et al.
Exergy-Anergy Representation of Turbomachine Performance Characteristics
Tihomir Varchev, Yiwen Yuan, Tobias Schateikis et al.
Mollified-sharp decomposition: a probabilistic regularization of parametric POD for shock-bearing flows
Oliver T. Schmidt
Load balancing for adaptive-precision interatomic potentials in materials science
David Immel, Godehard Sutmann
Braided endovascular implants for intracranial aneurysms: mechanics, hemodynamics, and clinical translation
Ratnadeep Pramanik, Duygu Dengiz, Mariya S. Pravdivtseva et al.