Geometric and physical considerations for realistic protein models
Isaac A. Hubner, Eugene I. Shakhnovich
Abstract
Protein structure is generally conceptualized as the global arrangement or of smaller, local motifs of helices, sheets, and loops. These regular, recurring secondary structural elements have well-understood and standardized definitions in terms of amino acid backbone geometry and the manner in which hydrogen bonding requirements are satisfied. Recently, "tube" models have been proposed to explain protein secondary structure in terms of the geometrically optimal packing of a featureless cylinder. However, atomically detailed simulations demonstrate that such packing considerations alone are insufficient for defining secondary structure; both excluded volume and hydrogen bonding must be explicitly modeled for helix formation. These results have fundamental implications for the construction and interpretation of realistic and meaningful biomacromolecular models.
Create a lesson
Related papers
SaltyMeta: a curated benchmark and protein language model-informed web tool for salty peptide prediction
Wanchao Chen, Wen Li, Yanan He et al.
Exploring Optimal Parameters for Ligand-Based Virtual Screening in Early Drug Discovery
Temitope Sobodu, Victor Chibuzor Johnson, Ryan Kern et al.
Synthesizing State-of-the-Art Structure Predictions from Soup of Co-folding Models
Hyosoon Jang, Taewon Kim, Sungsoo Ahn
Sequence-Informed Geometric Evaluation of RNA 3D Structures
Andrea Zerio, Yighua Yao, Alessandro Micheli et al.
Multi-ligand simultaneous docking of Carica papaya leaf phytochemicals, Carpaine and Rutin, reveals multi-mechanism inhibition of cancer proteins BCL-2 and WWP1
Merla Sudha, Asmita Saha, Belaguppa Manjunath Ashwin Desai et al.
Predicting directional flexibility in proteins
Vsevolod Viliuga, Leif Seute, Matteo Tadiello et al.