Comment on `Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies'
Simon C. Benjamin, Patrick M. Hayden
Abstract
In a recent paper, Eisert et al. presented a quantum mechanical generalization of Prisoner's Dilemma. They asserted that the maximally entangled game exhibits a unique Nash equilibrium which yields a pay-off equivalent to cooperative behaviour. In this comment we show that their observation is incorrect: there is no Nash equilibrium in the space of deterministic quantum strategies.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Logical CCZ state cultivation
Yuta Hirasaki, Jong Yeon Lee
Quantum-Aware Key Rank for Side-Channel Attacks evaluation
Yevgen Kotukh
Intermediate memory costs of quantum channel synthesis with a protected subsystem
Kai Liu, Deguang Han
Quantum Work Statistics from Entanglement-Assisted Invariance
Akira Sone, Akram Touil, Emery Doucet et al.
Petz Recovery through a Single Polar Transformation for Approximate Quantum Error Correction
Hanzhang Zhao, Shenglong Xu
Demonstration of a mobile ion-trap quantum device
Sara Alfaro, Dipesh Bhanushali, Sankarshan Choudapurkar et al.