Are Rindler Quanta Real? Inequivalent particle concepts in quantum field theory
Rob Clifton, Hans Halvorson
Abstract
Philosophical reflection on quantum field theory has tended to focus on how it revises our conception of what a particle is. However, there has been relatively little discussion of the threat to the "reality" of particles posed by the possibility of inequivalent quantizations of a classical field theory, i.e., inequivalent representations of the algebra of observables of the field in terms of operators on a Hilbert space. The threat is that each representation embodies its own distinctive conception of what a particle is, and how a "particle" will respond to a suitably operated detector. Our main goal is to clarify the subtle relationship between inequivalent representations of a field theory and their associated particle concepts. We also have a particular interest in the Minkowski versus Rindler quantizations of a free Boson field, because they respectively entail two radically different descriptions of the particle content of the field in the very same region of spacetime. We shall defend the idea that these representations provide complementary descriptions of the same state of the field against the claim that they embody completely incommensurable theories of the field.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Approximate Synthetic Spectra of Quantum Systems Associated with Compact Lie Groups
Junyang Liu, Hang Wang, Houjin Wang et al.
An example of universal braiding in Links--Gould topological quantum computation
Matthew Harper, Ben-Michael Kohli
Reasoning about Shared-Qubit Concurrency in Quantum Computing
Mingsheng Ying
Information-Geometric Representation of Upper Bounds on Fluctuation Growth in Open Quantum Systems
Newshaw Bahreyni, Paul M. Alsing
Initialization-controlled fault sensitivity and force-balance plateaus in noisy variational quantum optimization
Longhui Shen, Fangzhou Jin, Bin Guo
Quantum identity authentication protocol via perturbed probability amplitudes
Xiangqun Fu, Zheng Han, Hongwei Li et al.