A General Argument Against the Universal Validity of the Superposition Principle
Angelo Bassi, GianCarlo Ghirardi
Abstract
We reconsider a well known problem of quantum theory, i.e. the so called measurement (or macro-objectification) problem, and we rederive the fact that it gives rise to serious problems of interpretation. The novelty of our approach derives from the fact that the relevant conclusion is obtained in a completely general way, in particular, without resorting to any of the assumptions of ideality which are usually done for the measurement process. The generality and unescapability of our assumptions (we take into account possible malfunctionings of the apparatus, its unavoidable entanglement with the environmment, its high but not absolute reliability, its fundamentally uncontrollable features) allow to draw the conclusion that the very possibility of performing measurements on a microsystem combined with the assumed general validity of the linear nature of quantum evolution leads to a fundamental contradiction.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Using topology to reveal all mutually unbiased bases in dimension six
Mateo Cárdenes Wuttig, Joseph Tindall
Arithmetic Depth, Minimal Gate Alphabets, and Exact Program-State Resources for Single-Qubit Dyadic Programs
Tony Newton, Dan-Adrian German
Probing gravity at megahertz frequencies with levitated rotors
Matteo Fadel, Andrea Vinante
Optimal Holding Times for Entanglement Swapping
Van Sy Mai, Richard J. La, Abdella Battou
Quantum Algorithms for Molecular Response Functions: Resolvent Kernels, Time-Domain Sampling, Query Lower Bounds with Matched Single-Point Calibers, and a Six-Route Comparison
Yunlong Liu, Yujin Tang, Miao Xu et al.
GFlowQEC: Generative Flow Networks that Learn to Sample Quantum LDPC Codes
Nuno Batista, Gabriel Falcao, Penousal Machado