Everett and Structure
David Wallace
Abstract
I address the problem of indefiniteness in quantum mechanics: the problem that the theory, without changes to its formalism, seems to predict that macroscopic quantities have no definite values. The Everett interpretation is often criticised along these lines and I shall argue that much of this criticism rests on a false dichotomy: that the macroworld must either be written directly into the formalism or be regarded as somehow illusory. By means of analogy with other areas of physics, I develop the view that the macroworld is instead to be understood in terms of certain structures and patterns which emerge from quantum theory (given appropriate dynamics, in particular decoherence). I extend this view to the observer, and in doing so make contact with functionalist theories of mind.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Gaussian entanglement and quantum communication: geodesic optimization and multimode bounds
Hemant K. Mishra, Mark M. Wilde
On the coincidence of discrete and continuous definitions of Entanglement of Formation
Haobo Ma, Maksim E. Shirokov, Wenlin Zhang
EFI1PRS
Rishabh Batra
Relative-Entropy Geometry and Convergence in Nonconvex Wiretap Optimization
Farzin Salek, Masahito Hayashi
Deterministic and programmable generation of mechanical multipartite entangled states
Isabelle Franzen, Max-Emanuel Kern, Q. Rumman Rahman et al.
Quantum-enhanced mechanical sensing with machine-learning estimation
Finn Müßigbrodt, Andraž Omahen, Q. Rumman Rahman et al.