Reconsidering Bohr's reply to EPR
Hans Halvorson, Rob Clifton
Abstract
Although Bohr's reply to the EPR argument is supposed to be a watershed moment in the development of his philosophy of quantum theory, it is difficult to find a clear statement of the reply's philosophical point. Moreover, some have claimed that the point is simply that Bohr is a radical positivist. In this paper, we show that such claims are unfounded. In particular, we give a mathematically rigorous reconstruction of Bohr's reply to the original EPR argument that clarifies its logical structure, and which shows that it does not rest on questionable philosophical assumptions. Rather, Bohr's reply is dictated by his commitment to provide "classical" and "objective" descriptions of experimental phenomena.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Parallel quantum channel discrimination and numerical ranges in tensor product subspaces
Adam Bílek, Paulina Lewandowska, Ryszard Kukulski
Asymptotically Good Quantum Locally Testable Codes
William Gay, Fernando Granha Jeronimo
All causally separable quantum processes are quantum circuits with classical control of causal order
Julian Wechs, Alastair A. Abbott, Cyril Branciard
Analytic leakage suppression with a single control field: fast two-qubit gates with tunable couplers
Lukas Heunisch, Michael J. Hartmann, Aashish A. Clerk
Procrastinating einselection in non-Markovian quantum dynamics
Michael J. Moody, Tara Kalsi, Agung Budiyono et al.
Quantum Entropy Contraction and Factorization from Hypercontractivity
Li Gao, Lijun Wang