Classical Three-Box "paradox"
K. A. Kirkpatrick
Abstract
A simple classical probabilistic system (a simple card game) classically exemplifies Aharonov and Vaidman's "Three-Box 'paradox'" [J. Phys. A 24, 2315 (1991)], implying that the Three-Box example is neither quantal nor a paradox and leaving one less difficulty to busy the interpreters of quantum mechanics. An ambiguity in the usual expression of the retrodiction formula is shown to have misled Albert, Aharonov, and D'Amato [Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 5 (1985)] to a result not, in fact, "curious"; the discussion illustrates how to avoid this ambiguity.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Parallel quantum channel discrimination and numerical ranges in tensor product subspaces
Adam Bílek, Paulina Lewandowska, Ryszard Kukulski
Asymptotically Good Quantum Locally Testable Codes
William Gay, Fernando Granha Jeronimo
All causally separable quantum processes are quantum circuits with classical control of causal order
Julian Wechs, Alastair A. Abbott, Cyril Branciard
Analytic leakage suppression with a single control field: fast two-qubit gates with tunable couplers
Lukas Heunisch, Michael J. Hartmann, Aashish A. Clerk
Procrastinating einselection in non-Markovian quantum dynamics
Michael J. Moody, Tara Kalsi, Agung Budiyono et al.
Quantum Entropy Contraction and Factorization from Hypercontractivity
Li Gao, Lijun Wang