Reply to: Comment on "Bohmian prediction about a two double-slit experiment and its disagreement with SQM"
O. Akhavan, M. Golshani
Abstract
In a recent paper, Struyve et al. [Struyve W, De Baere W, De Neve J and De Weirdt S 2003 J. Phys. A 36 1525] attempted to show that the thought experiment proposed in [Golshani M and Akhavan O 2001 J. Phys. A 34 5259, quant-ph/0103101] cannot distinguish between standard and Bohmian quantum mechanics. Here, we want to show that, in spite of their objection, our conclusion still holds out.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Discovering state-of-the-art quantum circuits with large language models
Andi Gu, Alek H. Kemeny, Susanne F. Yelin et al.
Stability of Quantum LDPC States under Local Pauli Noise
Tai-Hsuan Yang, Andrew D. Kim, Akash Vijay et al.
Magic in quantum trajectory unravelings of noisy random quantum circuits
Sara Santos, Alessio Paviglianiti, Vincenzo Savona
Magna: simulating magic state factories as cheaply as Clifford circuits
Yifei Wang, Yingfei Gu
Classical Capacity of Single-Mode Bosonic Gaussian Channels
Gerardo Adesso, Ludovico Lami, Vittorio Giovannetti
SynDebug: A Framework to Debug Logic Bugs in Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing Programs
Nicholas S. DiBrita, Jack Lange, Tirthak Patel