Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Are They Related to Quantum Paradoxology?
Elias P. Gyftopoulos, Michael R. von Spakovsky
Abstract
We review both the Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen (EPR) paper about the completeness of quantum theory, and Schrodinger's responses to the EPR paper. We find that both the EPR paper and Schrodinger's responses, including the cat paradox, are not consistent with the current understanding of quantum theory and thermodynamics. Because both the EPR paper and Schrodinger's responses play a leading role in discussions of the fascinating and promising fields of quantum computation and quantum information, we hope our review will be helpful to researchers in these fields.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Gaussian entanglement and quantum communication: geodesic optimization and multimode bounds
Hemant K. Mishra, Mark M. Wilde
On the coincidence of discrete and continuous definitions of Entanglement of Formation
Haobo Ma, Maksim E. Shirokov, Wenlin Zhang
EFI1PRS
Rishabh Batra
Relative-Entropy Geometry and Convergence in Nonconvex Wiretap Optimization
Farzin Salek, Masahito Hayashi
Deterministic and programmable generation of mechanical multipartite entangled states
Isabelle Franzen, Max-Emanuel Kern, Q. Rumman Rahman et al.
Quantum-enhanced mechanical sensing with machine-learning estimation
Finn Müßigbrodt, Andraž Omahen, Q. Rumman Rahman et al.