Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements
R. W. Spekkens
Abstract
An operational definition of contextuality is introduced which generalizes the standard notion in three ways: (1) it applies to arbitrary operational theories rather than just quantum theory, (2) it applies to arbitrary experimental procedures, rather than just sharp measurements, and (3) it applies to a broad class of ontological models of quantum theory, rather than just deterministic hidden variable models. We derive three no-go theorems for ontological models, each based on an assumption of noncontextuality for a different sort of experimental procedure; one for preparation procedures, another for unsharp measurement procedures (that is, measurement procedures associated with positive-operator valued measures), and a third for transformation procedures. All three proofs apply to two-dimensional Hilbert spaces, and are therefore stronger than traditional proofs of contextuality.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Gaussian entanglement and quantum communication: geodesic optimization and multimode bounds
Hemant K. Mishra, Mark M. Wilde
On the coincidence of discrete and continuous definitions of Entanglement of Formation
Haobo Ma, Maksim E. Shirokov, Wenlin Zhang
EFI1PRS
Rishabh Batra
Relative-Entropy Geometry and Convergence in Nonconvex Wiretap Optimization
Farzin Salek, Masahito Hayashi
Deterministic and programmable generation of mechanical multipartite entangled states
Isabelle Franzen, Max-Emanuel Kern, Q. Rumman Rahman et al.
Quantum-enhanced mechanical sensing with machine-learning estimation
Finn Müßigbrodt, Andraž Omahen, Q. Rumman Rahman et al.