Cramer's Transactional Interpretation and Causal Loop Problems
Ruth E. Kastner
Abstract
Tim Maudlin's argument for the inconsistency of Cramer's Transactional Interpretation (TI) of quantum theory has been considered in some detail by Joseph Berkovitz, who has provided a possible solution to this challenge at the cost of a significant empirical lacuna on the part of TI. The present paper proposes an alternative solution in which Maudlin's charge of inconsistency is evaded but at no cost of empirical content on the part of TI. However, Maudlin's argument is taken as ruling out Cramer's heuristic ``pseudotime'' explanation of the realization of one transaction out of many.
Create a lesson
Related papers
An entangling Hubbard quasiparticle collider on a digital quantum processor
Chan Bin Bark, Hanbyul Kim, Yoonil Koo et al.
A Warped Born Rule Turns an Observer into a Maxwell's Demon
Olumakinde Ogunnaike
A scalable sample-based quantum diagonalization solver for general Pauli-sum Hamiltonians
Yutaro Iiyama
Quantum Query Complexity of Maximum Degree and its Generalizations
Amin Shiraz Gilani, Nikhil S. Mande, Subhasree Patro et al.
Maximally antiflat fixed-particle-number fermionic states
Rahul Gupta, Arya Haghighian, James D. Whitfield
An Annealing-based Quantum Neural Network with Discrete Wavelet Transforms for Enhanced Air Pollution Nowcasting
Otto Menegasso Pires, André Saimon, Daniela Herrmann et al.