Comment on "Separability of quantum states and the violation of Bell-type inequalities"
Christoph Simon
Abstract
The statement of E.R. Loubenets, Phys. Rev. A 69, 042102 (2004), that separable states can violate classical probabilistic constraints is based on a misleading definition of classicality, which is much narrower than Bell's concept of local hidden variables. In a Bell type setting the notion of classicality used by Loubenets corresponds to the assumption of perfect correlations if the same observable is measured on both sides. While it is obvious that most separable states do not satisfy this assumption, this does not constitute "non-classical" behaviour in any usual sense of the word.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Approximate Synthetic Spectra of Quantum Systems Associated with Compact Lie Groups
Junyang Liu, Hang Wang, Houjin Wang et al.
An example of universal braiding in Links--Gould topological quantum computation
Matthew Harper, Ben-Michael Kohli
Reasoning about Shared-Qubit Concurrency in Quantum Computing
Mingsheng Ying
Information-Geometric Representation of Upper Bounds on Fluctuation Growth in Open Quantum Systems
Newshaw Bahreyni, Paul M. Alsing
Initialization-controlled fault sensitivity and force-balance plateaus in noisy variational quantum optimization
Longhui Shen, Fangzhou Jin, Bin Guo
Quantum identity authentication protocol via perturbed probability amplitudes
Xiangqun Fu, Zheng Han, Hongwei Li et al.