Reply to "Comment on 'A linear optics implementation of weak values in Hardy's paradox'"
S. E. Ahnert, M. C. Payne
Abstract
The comment by Lundeen et al. contains two criticisms of our proposal. While we agree that the state-preparation procedure could be replaced by a simpler setup as proposed by the authors of the comment, we do not agree with the authors on their second, and more important point regarding two-particle weak measurements. We believe this to be the result of a misunderstanding of our original paper.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Using topology to reveal all mutually unbiased bases in dimension six
Mateo Cárdenes Wuttig, Joseph Tindall
Arithmetic Depth, Minimal Gate Alphabets, and Exact Program-State Resources for Single-Qubit Dyadic Programs
Tony Newton, Dan-Adrian German
Probing gravity at megahertz frequencies with levitated rotors
Matteo Fadel, Andrea Vinante
Optimal Holding Times for Entanglement Swapping
Van Sy Mai, Richard J. La, Abdella Battou
Quantum Algorithms for Molecular Response Functions: Resolvent Kernels, Time-Domain Sampling, Query Lower Bounds with Matched Single-Point Calibers, and a Six-Route Comparison
Yunlong Liu, Yujin Tang, Miao Xu et al.
GFlowQEC: Generative Flow Networks that Learn to Sample Quantum LDPC Codes
Nuno Batista, Gabriel Falcao, Penousal Machado