Reply to M. Ziman's "Notes on optimality of direct characterization of quantum dynamics"
M. Mohseni, D. A. Lidar
Abstract
Recently M. Ziman [quant-ph/0603151] criticized our approach for quantifying the required physical resources in the theory of Direct Characterization of Quantum Dynamics (DCQD) [quant-ph/0601033, quant-ph/0601034] in comparison to other quantum process tomography (QPT) schemes. Here we argue that Ziman's comments regarding optimality, quantumness, and the novelty of DCQD are inaccurate. Specifically, we demonstrate that DCQD is optimal with respect to both the required number of experimental configurations and the number of possible outcomes over all known QPT schemes in the 22n dimensional Hilbert space of n system and n ancilla qubits. Moreover, we show DCQD is more efficient than all known QPT schemes in the sense of overall required number of quantum operations. Furthermore, we argue that DCQD is a new method for characterizing quantum dynamics and cannot be considered merely as a subclass of previously known QPT schemes.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Spectral Fingerprints of Gauge Theories on a Quantum Computer
Graham Van Goffrier, Debasish Banerjee, Bipasha Chakraborty et al.
Dynamics of local quantum information in random unitary circuits
Ratul Thakur, Sthitadhi Roy
Factorized Boolean representations for efficient quantum synthesis
Mehul Shah, Robert Fiszer, Marek Perkowski
Detuning- and Stark-robust Rydberg gates
Elie Bataille, Gyohei Nomura, Manuel Endres
Krylov Break Times from an Inhomogeneous Lieb--Robinson Light Cone
Shunji Matsuura, Yoji Kawamura, Joseph Salfi et al.
Stochastic transport of a Goldstone mode in a self-organized atomic crystal
Zhanhai Yu, Di Xiang, Xiaotian Zhang et al.