Reply to M. Ziman's "Notes on optimality of direct characterization of quantum dynamics"
M. Mohseni, D. A. Lidar
Abstract
Recently M. Ziman [quant-ph/0603151] criticized our approach for quantifying the required physical resources in the theory of Direct Characterization of Quantum Dynamics (DCQD) [quant-ph/0601033, quant-ph/0601034] in comparison to other quantum process tomography (QPT) schemes. Here we argue that Ziman's comments regarding optimality, quantumness, and the novelty of DCQD are inaccurate. Specifically, we demonstrate that DCQD is optimal with respect to both the required number of experimental configurations and the number of possible outcomes over all known QPT schemes in the 22n dimensional Hilbert space of n system and n ancilla qubits. Moreover, we show DCQD is more efficient than all known QPT schemes in the sense of overall required number of quantum operations. Furthermore, we argue that DCQD is a new method for characterizing quantum dynamics and cannot be considered merely as a subclass of previously known QPT schemes.
Create a lesson
Related papers
Approximate Synthetic Spectra of Quantum Systems Associated with Compact Lie Groups
Junyang Liu, Hang Wang, Houjin Wang et al.
An example of universal braiding in Links--Gould topological quantum computation
Matthew Harper, Ben-Michael Kohli
Reasoning about Shared-Qubit Concurrency in Quantum Computing
Mingsheng Ying
Information-Geometric Representation of Upper Bounds on Fluctuation Growth in Open Quantum Systems
Newshaw Bahreyni, Paul M. Alsing
Initialization-controlled fault sensitivity and force-balance plateaus in noisy variational quantum optimization
Longhui Shen, Fangzhou Jin, Bin Guo
Quantum identity authentication protocol via perturbed probability amplitudes
Xiangqun Fu, Zheng Han, Hongwei Li et al.